Tuesday October 28, 2008
Clint MacNichol - 10:27 PM ADT

Short-sighted voters lead to bad politicians.

The WoodLawn Review

No matter where you live, the 'short sighted' voter can be found. He or she is effecting, in a negative fashion, how our government is administered. There is no doubt they exist. How do we know? By simply observing the decisions or strategies of politicians, one cannot help but notice someone is catering to this demographic.

The 'short-sighted' voter is a reactionary person who is easily swayed. Their opinion is typically based on two concepts. Firstly, the party in power is always wrong and in need of change. Secondly, which can override the first concept, the promise of tax cuts or other fees seen as taxes will draw positive reaction. Unforntunately, the short-sighted voter only takes such an announcement at face value and does not take into account the repercussions of reduced government income.

The latest of these examples came when Stephen Harper and the Conservatives initiated their 2% reduction of the GST two elections ago. At face value, politically a great strategy. Offering to reduce "taxes" gets the short-sighted voter's attention. Offering to cut the GST could only be seen as a perfect election stance. Easy to understand and easy to explain, especially to the 'Short-sighted' voter. When the smoke clears however, there can only be one response to such a concept. Jim Davies, who teaches economics at the University of Western Ontario in London, said it best "Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid".

An overwhelming number of economists have agreed reductions in income taxes would be far more effective in the 'real' world. It is even hard to believe our Prime Minister, an economist, would agree to this policy as a good idea behind closed doors. Slashing the GST is just something that can be spoon fed to the public during an election. Hence the reason why the Tories committed to reducing the excise tax on fuel during 2008 election.

Given our current economic outlook and the fact Canada will go into deficit status trying to boost the economy, the extra 1 Billion in revenue (from gst) would come in handy.

Examples even exist closer to home of the 'short-sighted' voter. Cont'd Here

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Sounds like you never met a tax you didn't like. It's people like you that have driven the underground economy in this country. How about less income tax and less consumptions taxes? I doubt that you would support this idea because it would require a proportional reduction in government spending and you wouldn't want the government to control less of our lives.
9
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Michael Corleone, Fredericton on 29/10/08 04:17:54 PM ADT
Michael Corleone - You missed my point. If politicians could deal with more informed voters, they could put in place initiatives such as real tax reform. When you deal with a group of voters who do not understand most policy initiatives it is hard to get anything started.

Michael, it appears you may exhibit characteristics of the 'short-sighted' voter. Your response was very much reactionary and blaming the government seems to identify your ignorances.

As for my tax policies, I would like to see a system that is based solely on a comsumption tax. Let me start off with more of my money, then let me decide what I buy and how I am taxed.

You can't have lower income taxes AND lower consumption taxes aAND maintain many of the quality government programs the we all benefit from.

And by the way, unless you had ZERO TAXES, the underground economy would keeping truckin along.

2
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Clint MacNichol, Moncton on 29/10/08 05:15:19 PM ADT
Bottomline is this. In a democracy we have to pay taxes. WHY you CONservatives ask?

Because someone has to pay for the roads you drive on,for the healthcare services you use ONLY TO MENTION A COUPLE OF REASONS!

Only a GD Conservative would believe you can run a country without having someone pay taxes.

CONservatives run the country into debt then the Liberals HAVE TO make some cuts to bring down the dept and just when we get the books in order along comes another CONservative VOTE BUYING regime to drive us into debt again AND AROUND AND AROUND SHE GOES!!!

These CONservatives ranted and raved about Paul Martin getting the books in order by cutting money to the provinces! JUST YESTERDAY these CONservatives said they were looking into cutting payments to the provinces!!!!

GO FIGURE EH?

3
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
T. Langford, Montreal on 01/11/08 04:38:19 PM ADT
T Langford: I understand your point. The only thing I would add is this question: Since you love paying taxes so much why don't you voluntarily contribute even more to support the crackpot programs that government is constantly coming up with?
3
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Michael Corleone, Fredericton on 02/11/08 03:56:19 PM AST
T Langford: Democracy? Isn't that 2 wolves and a lamb having a vote on what they are having for dinner?
2
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Michael Corleone, Fredericton on 02/11/08 04:48:14 PM AST
RE:Since you love paying taxes so much why don't you voluntarily contribute even more to support the crackpot programs that government is constantly coming up with?

I see you like twisting around what was said! I did not say I loved paying taxes I DID say paying taxes was necessary!

IF IT ISN'T then how about YOU explaining where you'd get the money from to run the country!

HINT: Money doesn't grow on trees!
1
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
T. Langford, Montreal on 03/11/08 04:53:56 PM AST
T Langford: If you want to play that game then I will ask you to review my post and tell me where I said I didn't support the payment of any taxes. I beleive the term is " less " taxes. As to your comment about money not growing on trees: I agree with you. Money is earned through the blood, sweat and tears of mostly hard working people, extorted from them by Dept of Revenue and has been thrown down the toilet by wasteful Big Government and their Big ideas for too many years. My suggestion to start reducing spending without any pain would be to get rid of the Governor Generals office, plus all the provincial lieutenant governors. Next, get rid of the Cnadian Senate and stop subsidizing the CBC and Radio Canada. There, I've saved $2.5 Billion a year,each year for the rest of our lives. This is too easy. Just think what could be done if we really knew what the government was doing with our money?
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Michael Corleone, Fredericton on 03/11/08 09:05:24 PM AST

Blog: The WoodLawn Review

Armed with only common sense. This writer questions and provides commentary on policy, current events and the decision makers.
Advertisement

RSS Feed

Add this blog RSS feed to your newsreader or web site. For more information detailing how this RSS feed, and others on this site, may be used click here.

Search Articles